Wallpaper Zilivyflaba: [MyTuneBD.Com] Private Car Control

Sunday, March 16, 2008

[MyTuneBD.Com] Private Car Control

Car Control
by Edwin J.Feulner, Ph.D.
Cars are a menace to society. Every year they lead to thousands of
deaths. Criminals use them in committing crimes. And when mixed with
drugs or alcohol, their deadly potential increases. In short, cars
should be banned.

Sounds crazy, right? But substitute "guns" for "cars" and you have
the gun-control argument in a nutshell.

Gun-control advocates will argue that the comparison is unfair, and
it is: To guns. The truth is, cars are more dangerous than firearms.
In 1997 there were 43,458 motor vehicle deaths in the United States,
according to the National Center on Health Statistics. By
comparison, there were 32,436 firearms deaths—and fully half of
those were suicides.

Notice I said motor vehicle deaths, not motor vehicle accidents.
Some will say that gun victims are murdered while car-crash victims
are "accidentally" killed, an argument designed to make guns
look "bad" and cars "neutral." But 39 percent of all fatal crashes
involve drunk drivers using their cars as deadly weapons. By the
numbers, criminals kill about 15,000 people a year with guns, and
drunk drivers kill about 15,000 people a year with two-ton machines
that can travel at more than a hundred miles per hour. Perhaps we
should pass a law banning "Saturday Night Chryslers."

Not only do guns cause fewer deaths than the activists would have us
believe, they can also be life-savers. According to John Lott, a
professor at the University of Chicago, as many as 2 million crimes
a year are prevented in the United States because the potential
victim is armed. In Canada and Great Britain, for example, where gun
controls are stringent, 50 percent of all break-ins occur while the
victims are at home. In the United States, where many homeowners own
weapons—and the criminals are aware of this—87 percent of all home
burglaries occur when the residents are away, Lott notes in his
book "More Guns, Less Crime." Is there a lesson here?

For his contribution to the gun-control debate, Professor Lott has
become an intellectual pariah. Elite opinion-shapers, who have
embraced gun control with religious fervor, want nothing to do with
him. In their view, if you have something nice to say about guns
you're one of those people—the kind who hunt ducks with bazookas,
worry about Communists invading their cul-de-sac, and name their
kids "Smith" and "Wesson."

Of course, gun-control snobs are seldom at risk of serious crime
themselves. It's easy to preach against guns from gated communities
protected by private police forces. But suggest that the $8-an-hour
rent-a-cop who guards these neighborhoods be allowed to have a gun
to protect his own family, and the gun-control zealots wax
hysterical.

Witness today's political debate, which is rife with talk of rights—
a "Patients' Bill of Rights" for those who want their insurance
plans to cover liposuction, an "Airline Passengers' Bill of Rights"
for those who want more (or fewer) peanuts in their in-flight
snacks. Mention constitutional rights, however, including the right
to own a gun, and you'll be accused of being a Neanderthal.

In Maryland, Attorney General Joseph Curran can't be bothered with
the Second Amendment. He wants laws that would ban all handguns in
the state. Never mind that Curran is sworn to uphold the Maryland
constitution, which guarantees Maryland citizens the protections of
the U.S. Constitution. When it comes to the Bill of Rights, some
politicians defend only the parts they like.

That's the way the gun-control crowd wants it. No 225-year-old scrap
of parchment will stand in the way of their drive to banish guns—but
not cars, rocks, knives, baseball bats, or any other object used to
inflict harm—from the face of the earth. It's that kind of thinking
that poses the real threat to Americans.

Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation
(www.heritage.org), a Washington-based public policy research
institute.

Distributed nationally by the Scripps Howard News Service